The Brady Bunch Strikes Back

That Paul Helmke idiot is at it again in his efforts to prevent Law Abiding Citizens their constitutional rights to own a firearm.You can read his blog on the upcoming monumental Supreme Court case of DC vs. Heller, which centers on whether or not this law abiding citizen, Mr. Heller, can own a firearm in Washington DC. The Brady Bunch continues to insist they only want sensible gun laws.

However, for them that would mean no one accept law breaking criminals could posses a firearm.

http://www.bradycampaign.org/blog/category/parker-v-district-of-columbia/

The Brady Bunch insists that the courts are in a deep fantasy for even considering the notion that Mr. Heller has the right to own a firearm. The problem is they are more concerned about their political agenda (to grab all guns from law abiding citizens) than to allow due process through the legal and justice system to play out. It is the task on the Supreme Court to uphold and if necessary interpret the constitution.

Why is the Brady Campaign so eager to take this task away from the Supreme Court?It is because they are scared and realize this case has a chance of backfiring on them. It is for that reason they refuse to allow the due process given by the constitution to the Supreme Court and rather make themselves judge, juror, and executioner of the U.S. Constitution. If they are so confident the high court and the U.S. Constitution will side with them, why are they so reluctant to allow the Courts to consider the case?The debate will center over the following words in bold, as will future blogs.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Much debate will be spent with the Gun Grabbers claiming only “a militia” can own firearms, while Law Abiding Citizens will claim that the “right of the people” designates the general populous. My stance is clear. The crux of this amendment is “The right of the People” which applies to every citizen on this great country. For this we must look to history and realize that the founding fathers not only intended but expected that every able man be armed with a firearm. This amendment was not written so that a military can exist, but as a means for THE PEOPLE to protect themselves from all threats, including Tyranny by one’s own government.

Between 1768 and 1777 it was the Policy to the British government disarm colonialists of their firearms. If was for this very reason the Second Amendment was written….as a means to protect oneself from tyrannical governments. The Royal British Crown argued just as the Brady Bunch and other Gun Grabbing groups claim today. “You don’t need arms for your own protection. The police and military will protect you.”However, who will protect us from the protectors? Use your brain and review history.

Wherever gun confiscation takes place tyranny, ethnic cleansing, and government sponsored massacres are sure to follow.Read my blog on what our Founding Fathers said about Gun Rights. I can guarantee you, the Brady Bunch wont read them, acknowledge them or interact with them. Anyone saying such things would be “gun nuts” to them.

"The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that it is their right and duty to be at ALL times armed."-Thomas Jefferson